we'll advocate for your needs and be with you
every step of the way.
Most business disputes start as a contract problem. Some of them are not. When a competitor poaches your client list, a former partner diverts an opportunity to a company they quietly set up, or a supplier lies about what they are selling, the injury comes from the conduct itself rather than from a broken promise. Those claims carry different elements, different proof requirements, and often a wider range of recoverable damages than a straight breach of contract action.
Rokita Law, P.C. represents businesses in Los Angeles and Orange County on both sides of these disputes. Amanda Rokita handles claims for interference with contract and prospective economic advantage, unfair competition, trade secret misappropriation, fraud and misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, and trade libel. The early decisions matter here. What you preserve, who you notify, and whether you move for injunctive relief in the first weeks often determines what the case is worth a year later.
Schedule a Business Torts Consultation
A business tort is a wrongful act that causes financial harm to a company or its owners, independent of, or in addition to, any contract between the parties. Unlike a breach of contract claim, which requires an existing agreement that was violated, a business tort can arise even when there’s no contract between the parties at all, such as when a competitor interferes with your relationship with a client.
Not every harm to a business comes from a broken contract. Sometimes it comes from a competitor spreading false information, a former employee taking trade secrets to a rival, or a business partner misrepresenting facts to induce a deal. These situations fall under business torts, a category of civil wrongs that cause financial harm outside of, or alongside, a contractual relationship. A business torts attorney at Rokita Law, P.C., represents California companies and owners pursuing or defending these claims.
Business tort claims cover a range of conduct, and the type of claim affects what has to be proven and what remedies are available.
Typical process: Consultation → Evidence Review → Claim Assessment → Demand or Filing → Resolution
Many business tort claims trace back to gaps a company could have closed earlier: a departing employee who was never bound by a properly drafted confidentiality agreement, or a partnership without clear terms governing what happens if a co-owner competes after leaving. Having a business contracts and negotiation attorney build strong confidentiality, non-solicitation, and trade secret protections into your agreements from the outset makes a tort claim easier to prove, and in some cases prevents the harm from happening at all.
Fraud claims in California generally carry a three-year statute of limitations under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 338, though the exact deadline can depend on how a specific claim is characterized and when the harm was discovered. Beyond the legal deadline, evidence in these cases tends to degrade quickly. Communications get deleted, witnesses’ memories fade, and a competitor’s ongoing conduct can cause more harm the longer it goes unaddressed.
“I’m not sure this counts as fraud, it just feels dishonest.” Many business tort claims start exactly this way. An initial review can clarify whether the conduct meets the legal elements of a claim.
“I don’t have hard proof, just a strong suspicion.” A consultation can help identify what evidence exists, what more might be available through discovery, and whether the suspicion is strong enough to act on.
“This involves a former employee or partner, and it feels personal.” Business tort claims involving insiders are common. The legal analysis focuses on the conduct and the harm, not the prior relationship.
“I’m worried about the cost of pursuing this kind of claim.” Business tort litigation can be resource-intensive, which is exactly why an early consultation to assess the strength of the claim matters before committing to that path.
“I’m the one being accused, and I don’t think I did anything wrong.” Business tort defense is just as much a part of this practice area as pursuing claims. Early legal advice can shape the response before it becomes a bigger problem.
A breach of contract claim requires an existing agreement that one party failed to honor. A business tort can arise even without a contract between the parties, such as when a competitor interferes with your relationship with a client or spreads false information about your business.
Intentional interference with contract generally occurs when a third party, aware of an existing contract, intentionally acts to induce a breach of that contract, causing damage to one of the contracting parties. It requires proof of the contract, the third party’s knowledge of it, and intentional conduct that caused the breach.
It depends on the specific claim. Fraud claims generally carry a three-year statute of limitations under Code of Civil Procedure Section 338, while other business tort claims may follow different deadlines. Because the correct classification of a claim can affect the deadline, it’s worth confirming the applicable statute of limitations with an attorney as soon as possible.
Under certain circumstances, yes. An employer can be liable for the tortious conduct of an employee acting within the scope of their employment, depending on the specific facts involved.
Depending on the claim, remedies can include compensatory damages for financial harm, and in cases involving fraud or malice, punitive damages may also be available. Unfair competition claims under Business and Professions Code Section 17200 are generally limited to injunctive relief and restitution rather than damages. The specific remedies depend on the claim and the facts proven.
Business tort: A wrongful act, such as fraud, unfair competition, or interference with a contract, that causes financial harm to a company or its owners outside of a contractual relationship.
Intentional interference with prospective economic advantage: A claim arising when a party intentionally disrupts a business relationship that was reasonably likely to result in an economic benefit, even without an existing contract.
Trade secret misappropriation: The improper acquisition, use, or disclosure of confidential business information that provides a competitive advantage.
Unfair competition: Under California’s Unfair Competition Law, business practices that are unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent and cause harm to a competitor or consumer.
Rokita Law, P.C. represents business clients from its Beverly Hills office, serving companies throughout Los Angeles County, and its Newport Beach office, serving businesses throughout Orange County. Business tort matters in the region often involve entertainment, retail, real estate, and professional service companies where competitive relationships and confidential information carry real financial stakes.
Business tort claims often depend on evidence that doesn’t hold up well over time. An initial consultation can help you understand your options while that evidence is still available.
If your business has been harmed by fraud, unfair competition, or interference in Los Angeles or Orange County, call Rokita Law, P.C. at (888) 765-4825 or schedule a consultation online.